Cool Forex Trading Resource Scalping Webinar
Posted by admin
Forex Trading Resources Alert:
Just watched a very nice video on how to increase profits with a
really easy forex scalping strategy.
Here’s the link:
http://www.BestTradingVideos.com/DelphiScalper
Good Trading!
Guy
Forex trading resources Webinar
Dirt Cheap Stock Trading Resource
Posted by admin
Are you new when it comes to stock trading and stock investing? Are you a little confused by all the info out there?
I know exactly how you feel, and that’s why I’m glad I found this video which will give you some good info on stock trading and stock investing courses.
So, sit back, relax, & watch the video here:
http://www.BestTradingVideos.com/StockTale
Make sure you watch the whole thing, because I think you’ll really find it useful.
Good Trading,
Attention New Stock, Futures and Forex Trading Resources
Posted by admin
I’ve decided to do the unbelievable and give away the $97.00 Rapid Fire Trading Course for FREE! I think you will find it a super easy fun good trading resource.
http://StockTradingInvestingCourses.com/FreeRapidFire
Good Trading
Guy
p.s. I will be away a few days as my mother is in the hospital.
Which Online Broker Is Best For Me?
Posted by admin
I’m 23 years old and would like to invest some of my money. I’ve already put in a good amount of money into mutual funds, now I’m looking to actively manage a few stocks of my own.
I work full time, so I don’t have the time and resources to invest like a day trader would. However, I would still like to have the option to buy/sell stocks at a reasonable price if I believe the company is under/overperforming. Therefore, would any online brokerage tools be beneficial to me? Which company has the lowest fees and won’t penalize me if I don’t actively trade.
Any other advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
All major brokerage firms provide their clients with on-line services, including trading platforms, latest market & financial news and research.
Customer need to select the site that is best for them. Traders have requirements in a site, while investors have other requirements.
Although most sites are geared to general securities and commodities, however customers may have special needs for the types of products they trade, and the markets in which they trade. For example I use Fidelity for investing. Scottrade for equities trading and ThinkorSwim for option trading
It seems that the most popular firms for on-line investing/trading all of which provide excellent platforms and services are; Scottrade; Chas.Schwab; TDAmeritrade; Fidelity; E-Trade and Thinkorswim. In your situation, you may be best served if you select Scottrade or Ameritrade
How can I email my report to McLovin?
Posted by admin
Sean Dickinson
English III
Mr. Brown
November 17, 2009
Overpopulation
Overpopulation is one of the fastest growing problems facing the United States today. It has taken root in almost every possible background and setting in America. An analysis of Overpopulation will show that several issues negatively effecting the United States such as; global warming, national debt, unemployment, and teen pregnancy are directly related to overpopulation.
By now most people by now have heard about global warming and the various threats it poses to the world and that the main cause of climate change is humans. Well if this is true then you would have to acknowledge that the growing population would then be the main cause of global warming. If there are more people in the world today than there was in 1999 then obviously the effects of global warming would be worse now because there are more people to produce the harmful gases that are said to help cause climate change. In addition, more people need more resources that also have a negative effect on the environment such as the need for trees, which reduces the number of trees converting C02 into oxygen. An additional problem is the need for vehicle transportation, and when the vehicles burn off fuel it causes pollution which also contributes to climate change. If we could lower the country’s population then we could lower the use of fossil fuels and other resources that produce greenhouse gases which then reduces pollution and global warming and creates a healthier and safer place for us to live in. One more problem that ties climate change in with another main problem that our country faces is food consumption. People need to eat food in order to survive, so no matter what your income is or what your status is whether you are rich or poor if you wish to live you need to eat food and agriculture contributes to global warming because many farm animals such as cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, and camels produce methane through their manure, which is another type of greenhouse gas, or gas in an atmosphere that absorb and emit radiation within the thermal infrared range, that harms the environment. Americans consume more meat/animal products per capita than any other country even though America is only the third most populous country (FAO). So once again if the U.S. can just reduce overpopulation it can reduce global warming and allow for the excess food to be given out or sold to less fortunate people in the U.S. and other countries.
Although food is not the only thing that the United States consumes the most of. Currently the United States has an estimated population of around 307 million people and accounts for only about 5% of the world’s total population of 6.8 billion people (Census) but we consume more energy than any other country by using about 25% of the world’s primary energy while producing only 16% of the energy we use. This results in a poor economy because we are forced to import more goods than we produce creating an unfavorable balance of trade for our economy, which then causes the U.S. to go into national debt because of our massive trade deficit with the rest of the world. And this continues on like the domino effect causing stress on everyone because when the economy is bad it means just about everyone suffers in some way from it. If there were less people the wealth could be distributed more evenly among people, there would more food for everyone not just in the U.S. but in other un-developed countries, more space for people to live especially in the cities, and most of all there would be enough jobs so that people could support themselves on their own.
Now a decreased population wouldn’t necessarily create more jobs but it would provide enough jobs for people. A smaller population would mean that there wouldn’t be as many un-employed people that actually need and want jobs. Then not as many people will need to rely on unemployment benefits, or welfare checks in order to pay their bills that way the government can focus the tax money it saves on those programs on other issues affecting the economy. Welfare programs were created to help people in actual need of help because they were forced into an unfavorable situation not because they choose to be or because they were to lazy and ignorant to prevent it, so I believe there needs to be a better system of identifying the people who take advantage of the system and then prosecuting those people for their crimes. But instead it just causes more and more money to be wasted that could be used to help our economy recover or at least start to recover. A smaller population would also help lower the crime rate somewhat; I’m not saying that everyone that commits crimes does it because they don’t have a job or that all criminals don’t have jobs but usually when people don’t see feasible options to solve their financial woes they turn either to the government for assistance or to crime or illegal
type in his email and hit send, weirdo
How to learn about business for my future career?
Posted by admin
I am a freshmen in high school. And I WILL own a business when I get older. I am not exactly sure what I want to do, but I am thinking about some type of investment company, such as a bank, or a mergers and acquisition company.
Since I am 100% positive that this is what I will do, I want to start as soon as possible.
There are multiple things that I want to know. First off what quality’s will I need to become better in business, or what quality’s will help me in business? They could be very general things such as people skills (which I currently lack, and thus need to improve on). Or they could be very specific things, like being good at golf.
I not only want to know what skills and personality traits I need, but also I want to learn some of the business terms and ideas/methods for doing business. This can include international trading laws, business laws in general, sales methods, marketing, etc.
I would appreciate any books or other resources related to these subjects.
You will need a college education as both your business ideas depend on your having knowledge of GAAP and tax law.
Then you will need some very rich relatives.
Good luck
can you help me better understand this article like summarizing it in words i know?
Posted by admin
WASHINGTON — With oil prices in record territory, presidential candidates stumping for votes in corn-centric Iowa, and congressional Democrats anxious to pass an energy bill to cut the nation’s dependence on Mideast oil, this should be the right moment for ethanol.
But a plan to dramatically increase ethanol production has become a major sticking point in congressional negotiations to complete work on the bill. And it has created a challenge for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose Democratic caucus has split over the issue.
Pro-ethanol Democrats and farm groups want the bill to require a nearly fivefold increase by 2022 in the amount of home-grown alternative fuels that must be blended into gasoline. They say the mandate would reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil and help America’s farmers.
Democrats on the other side, joined by environmental and food-industry groups, think the mandate could raise the price of corn used for food; harm the environment by using more land to produce biofuels; and gouge taxpayers by expanding ethanol subsidies.
Because of the provision’s popularity among farm-state lawmakers from both parties, it is seen as the glue holding together an energy bill that is expected to include the first significant increase in vehicle fuel-economy rules in decades.
And it might be enough to coax a signature from President Bush, who has made reducing reliance on foreign energy sources a priority.
"All along, energy-bill watchers have believed that the renewable-fuel standard was going to carry the entire bill," said Bill Wicker, a spokesman for Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.). "It’s just very popular."
The sense of political urgency for Pelosi to work out a compromise has risen along with prices at the pump.
"How she marries these various interests is really a challenge," said Sierra Club lobbyist Melinda Pierce. "The Democratic Party pie gets sliced differently every time, but it’s the leader’s job to figure out how to put it all together." House Democratic leaders want to vote on the bill next week, as soon as Congress returns from its recess.
Ethanol has been hotly debated since 1978, when Congress approved a tax break for the fuel. It has long been a key topic on the presidential campaign trail through the Corn Belt — especially in Iowa, which is first in the nation in ethanol production and in voting on presidential nominees.
In 2005, when it drafted the last energy bill, Congress decided to require that 7.5 billion gallons of ethanol be added annually to U.S. gasoline supplies by 2012, an amount expected to be reached soon. California uses about a billion gallons of ethanol.
At the heart of this year’s dispute on Capitol Hill is the Senate bill’s renewable fuel standard, which would mandate 36 billion gallons of alternative fuels by 2022 — up to 15 billion from corn-based ethanol. After 2016, an increasing portion would have to be advanced biofuels, including cellulosic ethanol produced from plant materials, such as switch grass and wood chips, thought to be easier on the environment than corn-based ethanol.
The House version of the bill includes no such mandate. Instead, it offers tax incentives to promote research on cellulosic ethanol. A Pelosi spokesman said the San Francisco Democrat wanted an expansion of the renewable fuel standard that would include "a significant boost to the cellulosic ethanol industry."
Rep. Henry A. Waxman of Beverly Hills is one of the many Democrats critical of the proposed standard. "It certainly would enrich the corn lobby, but it doesn’t offer the country the sustainable energy future that we need," he said. "Congress just gave the corn-based ethanol industry everything it wanted two years ago."
But Matt Hartwig of the Renewable Fuels Assn., a Washington-based trade group, says what is at stake is energy security. "This isn’t about giving the ethanol industry or any other energy industry what it wants. It is about making a choice as to our nation’s energy future," he said.
The fight has scrambled the usual alliances. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Assn. and the National Corn Growers Assn., allies in the recent fight to win House approval of a trade agreement with Peru, are on opposite sides of the battle over ethanol. Republicans are divided on the issue too, with some lawmakers from oil-producing states opposing the mandate, and others from corn-growing states supporting it.
Environmental groups, which support alternative fuels, want to ensure that stepped-up production does not damage the environment. They worry about more pollution from fertilizers and pesticides, and the conversion of grasslands and wildlife habitats to farmland.
"We are strong proponents of biofuels," said Jim Presswood, an energy expert at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "We think they’re a critical piece of solving global warming and reducing oil dependence. We just want to make sure they’re done right."
Forty-six Democrats, including several Californians, recently wrote congressional leaders to express similar concerns: "Rapid expansion of ethanol made from corn and other food crops has also created new unforeseeable challenges, including rising food prices, rising animal feed prices, heightened competition for water, water pollution, and the loss of grasslands and other valuable wildlife habitats."
The Senate measure included a requirement that the process used to create any new biofuel emit 20% less greenhouse gas than the production of gasoline, but environmentalists say the measure might not account for all of the potential environmental effects.
Rainforest Action Network, Friends of the Earth and other environmental groups recently wrote the House speaker urging her to reject the fuel mandate. The groups asserted that the measure could lead to the clearing of Indonesian rain forests for palm oil plantations.
Democrats have also written to congressional leaders to say the country would benefit far more from biofuels made from nonfood sources. That would do more, they said, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without reducing the availability — or increasing the price — of corn used for animal feed.
About 24% of the nation’s corn is expected to go to ethanol production this year, up from 13% in 2004, before Congress enacted the ethanol mandate.
Even though corn production has increased, corn prices have shot up. A bushel sold for about $3.50 last week, up from about $2 two years ago.
Food industry groups recently wrote lawmakers to complain that diverting corn from food to fuel "strains the supply for the commodity and increases prices for all users."
"The only winner of the renewable fuel standard has been corn farmers," said Scott Faber, vice president of federal affairs for the Grocery Manufacturers Assn. "Clearly, the losers have been moms who are having to pay more for the price of milk, meat and other basic staples at the supermarket."
Ethanol proponents, who say critics have exaggerated the problems, contend that the ethanol mandate’s effect on food prices would be negligible, perhaps no more than 0.2%. "We see a greater effect than that from a hard freeze in California," the National Corn Growers Assn. and other proponents recently wrote in a letter to lawmakers.
Lawmakers who support a mandate for increased production of domestically produced alternative fuel also emphasize a need to wean the U.S. from imports. "Sure, there are environmental considerations, but there are also national security considerations," said Wicker, Sen. Bingaman’s spokesman. "A lot of people who are supporting renewable fuels are doing it partly because they want to displace oil imported from parts of the world where they hate us."
Jon Doggett, vice president of public policy for the National Corn Growers Assn., said corn growers would be stepping up efforts to win passage of the renewable fuel standard as lawmakers visited their districts during the two-week Thanksgiving recess.
"Gas is over $3," he said, "and there’s a lot of constituents who are going to want to know what they’re going to do about it."
I translates into about ten paragraphs of blah, blah, blah.
In my opinion, biofuels are not the way to go. The energy conversion is lower. You get less mileages to the gallon, which would require more fuel and put more CO2 in the air.
They need to develop fuel cells instead.
The problem with fuel cells is that big energy delivery companies wouldn’t make any money selling efficient fuel cells.
ECON QUESTIONS please help me…….?
Posted by admin
28. Changes in the following variable DO NOT shift the demand curve for a good:
a. The price of the good.
b. Prices of other related goods.
c. The income of consumers.
d. The tastes of the consumers.
e. The expected future price of the good.
29. Modern economic growth is correlated
a. with the gradual reduction of the public sector as a share of GDP.
b. with an increase in the size of the public sector.
c. with a reduction in regulation and other government interference in business.
d. a and c.
e. All of the above
30. To counter external shocks, it would be advisable for a developing country
a. to rely on short-term capital movements in financing its investments.
b. to eliminate all barriers to imports.
c. to improve the credibility of its state apparatus.
d. to deregulate its banking system and rely on dollar-denominated financing.
e. All of the above.
31. Robinson takes 8 hours to write a computer program and 6 hours to produce a pair of jeans. Xena takes 4 hours to complete either task. Which of the following statements is INCORRECT?
a. Xena has the AA (Absolute Advtantage) producing both jeans and writing computer programs.
b. If they were to specialize and trade, Robinson would produce jeans.
c. Robinson has the AA producing both jeans and writing computer programs
d. Xena has the Comparative Advantage in writing computer programs.
e. Xena has the AA in producing jeans.
32. A point outside a production possibilities frontier
a. indicates that some resources are unemployed.
b. is unattainable for production purposes.
c. is worse than points on the production possibilities frontier.
d. implies that too much capital and not enough labor are used.
e. None of the above.
33. Suppose that to produce one pound of rice in Japan requires 3 hours of labor, whereas in the U.S. it requires 1 hour of labor. As a result, we can conclude that
a. Japan has a comparative advantage (“CA”) in producing rice.
b. The U.S. has the absolute advantage in producing rice.
c. Japan has the absolute advantage in producing rice.
d. The U.S. has a CA in producing rice.
e. None of the above.
28.a
29.b
30.b
31.c
32.b
33.d
I didn’t make these up! These are my real answers!
help regrding presentation in christ college ?
Posted by admin
I NEED SOME HELP REGARDING CHRIST COLLEGE PRESENTATION
CAN SOME ONE TELL ME WHERE I CAN FIND THIS TOPICS
Topics for presentation (MBA)
1. Academic dishonesty the first step in corruption
2. Should Academic freedom be permitted in our higher education
3. Indian Education reforms: One leap forward or two steps backward
4. Endangered species: Who is responsible to protect them
5. Should the Media be censored
6. Is History a valid tool to plan the future
7. Do we lack foresight in planning our cities
8. Academic pressure: Too much to handle
9. Was climate change the cause of the irregular monsoon in India
10. Is our nation prepared to handle national disasters
11.Why do we use cell phones while driving even though it is banned
12.Should newspapers be expected to reveal their sources
13.Should public servants have the right to strike
14.Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases
15. The negative impact of television on children
16. Is reform necessary in judicial nominations
17. Is censorship needed in the entertainment industry
18.Should copyright violations by students be penalized
19.Do Trade Unions have a relevance in the current corporate world
20.Global warming: A need for change
21.Should politics have a minimum qualification
22. Is the Media sensationalism of the 26/11 attacks justified
23. Is the government austerity drive a charade
24.Should individuals with criminal cases be allowed to stand for elections
25. Is a national infrastructure budget key in promoting industrial growth
26. Is our population an asset for growth
27.Should our policies be aimed at improving the quality of life
28. Should the private sector be allowed to participate in Urban development
29. The key to a successful enterprise: Embrace change with Ease?
30. Is telecom connectivity the symbol of an emerging modern, global power?
31. The key to success is promoting indigenous technology: Agree or Disagree
32.Are big dams an equitable venture
33.Communities should be empowered to manage their water resources
34. Do our planners lack foresight
35. Developing renewable energy sources is the means to secure a safe future
36.Encouraging public-private partnership will enable efficient infrastructure
solutions
37. The Maldivian underwater Ministerial summit: A gimmick or wake up call
38. Is it time for reforms to be implemented in the Indian judiciary
39.Will Obama’s anti-outsourcing law help US employment
40. Is agricultural output dependent on the vagaries of the monsoon?
41.Zero inflation and the consistent rise in food prices
42.What is the key to improve productivity of farmers?
43.Should films be pure entertainment or be a window to various topical issues
44.Are film festivals the only means to enjoy good cinema?
45.Will peace ever prevail in Pakistan?
46.Are Naxals and Maoists a serious threat to national security?
47.Why do youth avoid the study of pure sciences
48. The study of Social science must be promoted in undergraduate education
49.Can Airlines hold passengers to ransom?
50.Does marketing with a social cause give brands a human face
These are opinion questions. You need to form your own opinion on these issues and support your opinion.
Econ major: minor in geology or double major in finance or geo?
Posted by admin
The particular economics that I like the most are product and resource markets, as well as monetary policy’s relationship with them and global trade. I am studying to be an economic analyst someday and I would like to stick with commodity markets and futures and speculating their S & D.
The school that i am transferring to does not offer a minor in finance but they do in geology/ Earth sciences (as well as several other sciences,including environmental). I can also dual major in econ and either finance or geology (or another science that influence such markets).
What seems to be the best course of action for me?
Geo/ earth sci minor or a double major in either finance or geo/ earth sci?
Why do you have to have a minor/ My degree is in economics. I also did study in the business school, but did need to declare a minor. Depending how advanced you are, you may also be able to take graduate courses for you undergrad degree. I am glad I took advantage of that opportunity at University of MD.